![]() Indeed, even CAQDAS’ perceived advantages, such as its time-saving potential and potential for increased rigour and transparency, were criticised as false prophets that risked portraying a false sense of objectivity in qualitative data analysis and promoting a corresponding lack of reflexivity amongst CAQDAS users (MacMillan & Koenig, 2004). #Hyperresearch cinderella study softwareCritics of the CAQDAS ‘revolution’, in contrast, pointed to the potential for such software to impose analytic procedures and methodological assumptions upon researchers leading, for example, to ‘coding fetishism’ (Richards, 1997) or to researchers engaging in analytic activities without a sense of purpose and a clear rationale (Coffey et al., 1996 MacMillan & Koenig, 2004). CAQDAS, it was further argued, could not only facilitate high-level qualitative data analysis but could help make the process more transparent, reflexive and trustworthy, thereby broadening its appeal to both researchers and funders (O’Kane et al., 2021 Sinkovics & Alfoldi, 2012 Weitzman, 1999 Woods et al., 2016). This could allow researchers to dedicate more of their time to engaging in complex analytical tasks, such as axial and explanatory forms of coding that are central to the creation of grounded theory (Bringer et al., 2006 Morison & Moir, 1998 Webb, 1999). Using CAQDAS, advocates argued, could enable researchers to better manage large, complex and ‘messy’ datasets (Buston, 1997 Paulus & Lester, 2016 Sinkovics & Alfoldi, 2012) and automate repetitive analytical tasks, such as text searching and text retrieval, that were hitherto done by hand (Buston, 1997 Morison & Moir, 1998 Weitzman, 1999). Early CAQDAS enthusiasts, for example, referred to the emergence of programs such as Atlas.ti, HyperResearch and Ethnograph as something akin to a ‘digital revolution’ (Gibson et al., 2005) that may be capable of reshaping qualitative research across a range of disciplines including sociology, anthropology, nursing and business management, amongst others (Buston, 1997 Gibson et al., 2005 Morison & Moir, 1998 Webb, 1999 Weitzman, 1999). Since the early 1990s, the use of computer assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS) has been a contentious issue that has attracted impassioned advocates and staunch critics in equal measure. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |